Honestly that's OK for very large models with HA etc. However I've realized that Synology has lately bumped up its enterprise-like game with their own drives and memory modules on larger NAS units (8 bays and larger). Back then a lot of features Synology regularly supported were still in Beta with QNAP. It's far from perfect, but the price for hardware and time to get it working was actually quite interesting based on i.e. I remember Active Backup for MS 365 from Synology from a previous job. Also with BTRFS or ZFS both vendors have file systems that have a certain level of protection against bit rot, which is also something I do like in backups. ![]() Both QNAP and Synology have "storage whatever amount of users you can" policy so far. ![]() Other backup solutions in that market such as Veeam have a per user price tag, which in case of a school is distorting the price quite a bit (considering 150-200 employees vs. I'm considering a MS 365 Backup Solution and so far it seemed like if you want a "package" that does doesn't include a yearly license fee and storage price tag, that QNAP and Synology's do actually look pretty interesting.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |